In this review, I’m focusing only on InVideo’s AI Video Generator. I tested how it works, how easy it is to use and whether it actually delivers good results. Using the same set of prompts, I evaluated its output quality, prompt accuracy, consistency, generation speed, editing experience and how many credits each video costs to generate. By the end, you’ll have a clear idea of what the tool does well, where it falls short and whether it’s worth using. Let’s quickly dive in.
If you want to learn more about InVideo, check out this detailed InVideo review blog.
After signing up, you’ll see a screen similar to the one above. One thing I found a bit frustrating is that you can’t generate a video immediately after entering your prompt and uploading your reference images. Instead, InVideo first asks you to create a project by entering a project name. After that, it takes you through a few setup questions. I simply skipped those to get to the actual video generation screen.
From there, select Video and choose the AI video generation model you want to use. InVideo offers several models and each one has different capabilities, supported settings, and credit costs. The more advanced the model and the higher the quality settings you choose, the more credits you’ll spend. To avoid wasting credits, it’s best to pick a model and settings that match your specific needs rather than always choosing the highest-quality option.
I selected the Seedance 2.0 Fast model for this test. It lets you add up to 9 reference images, 3 reference videos and 3 audio references. You can generate videos up to 15 seconds long, choose from five aspect ratios and the maximum output resolution is 720p.
Before generating, make sure Audio is turned on if you want sound in the final video.
For my test, generating one video cost 8.7 credits and took about 3 minutes. The result was genuinely impressive. Right from the first attempt, the video quality exceeded my expectations. The only weak point was the audio. I’d rate it 4/10 because the sound wasn’t synced very well with the visuals.
Next, I tested the upscaling feature to see how many credits it uses and whether it’s worth it. Clicking Upscale takes you to InVideo’s collection of upscaling tools. I used the BytePlus VOD Video Upscaler, which took around 3 minutes to process the video. The upscaling cost 0.5 credits. The file size increased from 8.0 MB to 19.3 MB, and the upscaled version looked noticeably sharper with better overall image quality.
Test -1 (Reference Image + Text)
Lets see the output
Test -2 (Reference Image + Text)
For my second test, I used a different prompt and reference image. This time, Seedance 2.0 Fast completely missed the mark and the output wasn’t close to what I expected.
I then switched to Kling 3.0 Turbo and generated a 15-second video. It used 6.75 credits, took about 3 minutes, but the result was still disappointing.
Finally, I reduced the video length to 10 seconds and used Kling 3.0 Turbo again. This time, the output was much better and matched my prompt far more accurately. It cost 4.5 credits and the generation time was still around 3 minutes.
Lets see the output
Test -3 (Reference Image + Text)
For this comparison, I tested five different AI video generation models available inside InVideo using similar prompts and settings. Here’s how each one performed.
PixVerse V6 generated a 15-second video in 1080p with audio enabled. It cost 5.55 credits for a single output and took about 3 minutes to generate. The overall video quality looked good, but it didn’t follow my prompt very accurately. PixVerse also offers a lot of advanced video generation options. If you want to try the tool then click this and try pixverse ai video generation
Next, I tested HappyHorse 1.0. A 15-second video in 1080p with audio cost 17.25 credits and took around 3 minutes to generate. The result wasn’t bad and the audio was synced much better than some of the other models. However, the visuals had a dramatic, over-the-top cinematic style that reminded me of a Power Rangers Megazord scene, which may not suit every type of project.
My third test was Seedance 2.0 Fast. It generated a 15-second video in 720p since higher resolutions aren’t available for this model. It used 8.7 credits and the output looked good overall. However, I noticed a few logical inconsistencies in the generated scenes, even though the visual quality was solid.
Finally, I tested the standard Seedance 2.0 model. This model supports resolutions up to 4K with audio, but it’s also the most expensive. A 15-second 4K video costs 55.95 credits. For my test, I generated a 720p video instead, which used 10.95 credits. Out of all the models I tested, this one delivered the best results. The video followed my prompt accurately, had fewer logical errors and produced the most consistent overall output.
I also tried Kling 3.0 Turbo, but the results were disappointing, so I didn’t include it in the final comparison. That said, Kling offers several other video generation models, and some of them perform much better. If you’d like to see detailed testing with real outputs, check out my Kling AI review
Output 1Output 2Output 3Output 4
Looking for videos like the examples above? See my best Sora alternatives comparison, where I tested the top replacements using the same prompts and compared their real outputs.
My Overall Experience
Overall, I think InVideo AI is worth using. What I liked most is that you can access multiple AI video generation models from one platform instead of paying for each tool separately. It also includes useful features like video upscaling, editing, background removal and several other AI tools, making it a convenient all-in-one option.
One thing I learned during testing is that your settings matter just as much as your prompt. Choose the model that best fits the type of video you want to create and make sure your scene count matches the video duration. Too many scenes for a short video or too few scenes for a long one usually leads to weaker results.
Finally, write prompts that clearly explain what you want to see in the final video. Be specific, but don’t make them unnecessarily long. A concise prompt with clear details consistently produced better results in my tests.
InVideo Pros and Cons
✅ Pros | ❌ Cons |
|---|---|
✓ Access multiple AI video generation models in one platform | ✕ Video generation can take around 3 minutes |
✓ Built-in video upscaling | ✕ Doesn’t have its own proprietary AI video generation model |
✓ Downloads are easy and watermark-free (on eligible plans) | ✕ High-quality outputs consume a lot of credits |
✓ Simple and beginner-friendly interface | ✕ Built-in editing and AI tools increase credit usage |
InVideo AI Video Models (2026)
Video Model | Key Features | Maximum Output Resolution |
|---|---|---|
Seedance 2.0 | Frames, Reference to Video, Edit, Extend | 4K |
Gemini Omni Flash | Start Frame, Reference to Video, Edit | 720p |
Kling V3 Omni Video | Ingredients, Frames, Transformation, Reference to Video | 4K |
Seedance 2.0 Fast | Frames, Reference to Video, Edit, Extend | 720p |
Seedance 2.0 Mini | Frames, Reference to Video, Edit, Extend | 720p |
Luma Ray 3.2 | Generate, Edit, Reframe | 1080p |
Kling Video O1 | Transformation, Frames, Video Reference, Ingredients | 1080p |
PixVerse V6 | Frames, Ingredients | 1080p |
Veo 3.1 Fast | Frames, Ingredients, Extend | 4K |
Happy Horse 1.0 | Ingredients, Start Frame, Video Edit | 1080p |
PixVerse C1 | Frames, Ingredients | 1080p |
PixVerse 5.6 | Frames, Ingredients | 1080p |
LTX 2.3 Pro | Frames, Audio to Video, Retake Video, Extend, Reframe | 4K |
Wan 2.7 | Image to Video, Extend Video, Reference to Video, Video Edit | 1080p |
Grok Imagine Video | Text to Video, Image to Video, Video Editing | 720p |
InVideo AI Pricing Plans (July 2026)
Plan | Best For | Price (Annual Billing) | Credits / Month | AI Avatars & Voice Clones | Storage | iStock Assets | Concurrency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plus | Exploring | $17/moBilled $200/year | 75 | 4 | 20 GB | 100 | Limited |
Max | Occasional Use | $85/moBilled $1,000/year | 390 | 16 | 100 GB | 200 | 2× more than Plus |
Generative | Daily Use | $170/moBilled $2,000/year | 800 | 40 | 2 TB | 1,000 | 10× more than Plus |
Elite | Power Creators | $900/moBilled $10,800/year | 4,250 | 200 | 10 TB | 5,000 | 20× more than Plus |
Frequently Asked Questions
Final Thoughts
There are many excellent AI video generation tools available today, but purchasing and testing each one individually can quickly become expensive. That’s where InVideo AI stands out. Instead of paying for multiple subscriptions, you get access to a wide range of leading AI video models in a single platform, along with powerful editing and workflow features.
The main downside is that video generation can take around 3-4 minutes, depending on the model and complexity of your prompt. Aside from that, InVideo AI offers great value for creators who want to experiment with different AI models without managing multiple tools. If you regularly create AI videos, it’s a worthwhile investment.
